This explosive allegation served its evident purpose: Kaspersky was, as far as the US government was concerned, kaput, and its denials of espionage collusion fell on deaf ears. When he uploaded an exploit onto his home laptop in 2015, his Kaspersky antivirus functioned exactly as intended: it recognized the malware and uploaded a copy to Kaspersky's servers.Įnraged, the US said Kaspersky had handed the exploit to Russia's FSB spy agency, jailed Pho, and banned the use of Kaspersky across its entire government.ĭays after the Pho story first broke, however, rumors (started by the New York Times newspaper) began swirling that Israeli spies had hacked Kaspersky only to discover (so the story went) the infosec firm was working hand-in-glove with Russian spy agencies. Nghia Hoang Pho, who worked in the NSA's Tailored Access Operations (TAO) unit, was in the habit of taking his work home with him. In America's case, however, an NSA hacker's carelessness proved to be Kaspersky's undoing. This failed when the Dutch government said it was banning internal use of Kaspersky both Britain and the US did likewise. Like US-sanctioned enterprise infosec firm Positive Technology, Kaspersky tried to soothe fears in the West by moving its European base of operations to Switzerland in 2018. NSA dev in the clink for 5.5 years after letting Kaspersky, allegedly Russia slurp US exploits.Russian spies used Kaspersky AV to hack NSA staffer, swipe exploit code – new claim.Revealed: Numbers show extent of security fears about security biz Kaspersky Lab.UK government bans all Russian anti-virus software from Secret-rated systems.He also added, without mentioning Russia's military invasion of Ukraine and its indiscriminate killing of unarmed civilians as a result: "We believe that peaceful dialogue is the only possible instrument for resolving conflicts. Kaspersky is a private global cybersecurity company and, as a private company, does not have any ties to the Russian or any other government." Instead it said the decision is politically motivated.Ī company spokesman told The Register: "We believe this decision is not based on a technical assessment of Kaspersky products – that we continuously advocated for with the BSI and across Europe – but instead is being made on political grounds. Kaspersky, a stalwart of the consumer antivirus scene since its foundation in the late 1990s, denied – unsurprisingly – that it poses a risk to Westerners. If there are doubts about the reliability of the manufacturer, virus protection software poses a particular risk for the IT infrastructure to be protected. Therefore, trust in the reliability and self-protection of a manufacturer as well as his authentic ability to act is crucial for the safe use of such systems. Easy to deploy and manage, they provide precisely the superior, intelligent protection you need from existing and emerging threats.Antivirus software, including the associated real-time capable cloud services, has extensive system authorizations and, due to the system (at least for updates), must maintain a permanent, encrypted and non-verifiable connection to the manufacturer's servers. Kaspersky Targeted Security solutions provide deep protection to any component within your network including workstations, file servers, mail servers and Internet gateways. Why Kaspersky Targeted Security Solutions? Kaspersky Targeted Security solutions are an efficient and cost-effective way to employ the very anti-malware technology exactly where it’s required, allowing you to fully protect and control your changing IT environment. Kaspersky Targeted Security solutions have been designed to deliver superior, intelligent protection for specific components of your network, putting Kaspersky Lab’s deep protection technologies precisely where you need them most in your IT infrastructure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |